Open SourceWeb ServerMacWindowsLinuxOnlineBitNami Stacks make it incredibly easy to deploy your favorite open source software.Filter by these if you want a narrower list of alternatives or looking for a specific functionality of BitNami Application Stacks. Suggest changesThis page was last updated BitNami Application Stacks 79 Free Other great apps like BitNami Application Stacks are XAMPP, YunoHost, Sandstorm.io and CapRover.BitNami Application Stacks alternatives are mainly Web Servers but may also be Cloud Storage Services or Linux Distros. The best alternative is Docker, which is both free and Open Source. There are more than 25 alternatives to BitNami Application Stacks for a variety of platforms, including Linux, Windows, Online / Web-based, Mac and Self-Hosted solutions. BitNami Stacks include an open source application and all of the other software necessary to run it, such as Apache, MySQL, PHP or Ruby' and is a popular Web Server in the development category. apache-pogo Posts: 3 Joined: 13.BitNami Application Stacks Alternatives and Similar Apps / Services | AlternativeTo (function()() Skip to main contentSkip to site searchPlatformsCategoriesOnlineWindowsAndroidMaciPhoneLinuxiPadAndroid TabletProductivitySocialDevelopmentBackupRemote Work & StudyLoginSign up HomeDevelopmentBitNami Application StacksAlternativesBitNami Application Stacks AlternativesBitNami Application Stacks is described as 'BitNami Stacks make it incredibly easy to deploy your favorite open source software. These are just my observations as a long time user of XAMPP. This would alleviate the conflict with port 80 which occurs when two copies of XAMPP are running. Logically it seems that Bitnami should add MediaWiki to the existing server rather than make a second copy. I can probably drag the MediaWikw folder from the Bitnami installation into my original XAMPP installation and fix up the links. Each app could then be accessed by specifying a localhost subdirectory (e.g., localhost/mediawiki, or localhost/subversion, or localhost/trac, etc. To me the power of XAMPP was the fact that multiple apps could be installed on one XAMPP server. Now I would have assumed that this special version of Bitnami/MediaWiki would have looked for an existing installation of XAMPP and install it there, but instead it ignored the existing version and proceeded to install it's own copy. The two copies were both contending for Port 80. Later when I went to the XAMPP control panel and tried to restart Apache, I found that Bitnami had installed a second copy of XAMPP with MediaWiki. I ran the install which ran flawlessly, and MediaWiki appeared at localhost. I followed the links and downloaded MediaWiki from Bitnami. Then I noticed the additional information on the XAMPP localhost startup page about downloading what I thought were additional apps from Bitmani. I recently downloaded v1.8.3 of XAMPP for Windows and installed it as usual. XAMPP's move to using Bitnami caught me by surprise. I have installed multiple apps under XAMPP by downloading them from the developer's site, unpacking, and moving them into a sub-folder under htdocs. I've been using XAMPP for years and really think it is the best and easiest LAMP/WAMP, etc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |